When puritanical mixes with litigious...

topic posted Fri, February 6, 2004 - 1:41 PM by  Unsubscribed


Woman sues over Janet Jackon's breast

Fri Feb 6, 1:28 PM ET

CHICAGO (Reuters) - A Tennessee woman has filed a class action suit against Janet Jackson and others involved in her breast-baring Super Bowl halftime show, saying millions of people are owed monetary damages for exposure to lewd conduct.
 

The suit, filed earlier this week in federal court in Knoxville, Tennessee, also names pop star Justin Timberlake, who performed with Jackson, CBS Broadcasting, show producer MTV Networks Enterprises, and the parent of those two companies, Viacom.



The action seeks a court order to prevent anything like last Sunday's stunt from being repeated on U.S. network television prior to 10 p.m. local time when children might be watching.



No dollar figure for damages is mentioned in the suit, but it estimates that over 80 million U.S. viewers might be due compensation. CBS has said the game drew an average viewership of just under 89.6 million people. Advertising during the game sold for more than $2 million (1.1 million pounds) a spot.



The suit states that the ultimate compensatory damage figure, should a jury decide to grant damages, should be no higher than what the parties being sued made out of participating in and airing the Super Bowl and its halftime show.



If additional punitive damages are granted, it adds, they should be no higher than the "gross annual revenues of each defendant for the last three years..."



Those figures would probably run into the billions of dollars, according to the Smoking Gun, a Web site that first published the court papers.



During the halftime show Timberlake tore off half of Jackson's black leather bustier, exposing her right breast, while the two were singing a duet.



Jackson took the blame but said "it was not my intention that it go as far as it did."



CBS has already said it would use an "enhanced delay" on its February 8 broadcast of music's Grammy Awards so it can censor both audio and video as needed, and ABC also said it will use a delay on its February 29 broadcast of the Academy Awards (news - web sites).



The suit says the defendants knew the broadcast would be watched by millions of families with children but they "included in the halftime show sexually explicit acts solely designed to garner publicity and ultimately to increase profits for themselves. The suit mentions the breast exposure but also says the show in general contained "other lewd and sexually explicit conduct."



The law firm handling the suit issued a statement on Friday saying that neither the woman who filed it, Terri Carlin, nor her attorney, Wayne Ritchie, would comment. "The issue here is accountability and not more publicity," it said.
posted by:
Unsubscribed
  • Re: When puritanical mixes with litigious...

    Fri, February 6, 2004 - 2:26 PM
    I think Terri Carlin, and her attorney, Wayne Ritchie, are both nuts.
    • EJ
      EJ
      offline 90

      Re: When puritanical mixes with litigious...

      Fri, February 6, 2004 - 3:08 PM
      I mean what is the big deal ?? The woman who sue Jackson is jealous that she wasn't the one on the stage flashing her own skin.
      • Re: When puritanical mixes with litigious...

        Fri, February 6, 2004 - 10:48 PM
        I totally find the media is going way over board with the
        Breast deal. I truly believe if the media had not made such a huge deal out of it, the heat wouldn't have went as far as it did. I mean if it would have been the Dallas Cowgirls dancing
        on national TV, In short Skirts and low cut shirts, I truly
        believe nothing would have been said.
        Also about 2 years ago Xena, Or Lucy was singing the national
        anthem and exposed a breast. Not even a bit of press for that?
        I don't know if it's just me but people are getting way more
        nit picky. The smallest of things make the news in a huge way.

        The same night Janet had the exposer, there was a man running
        on the football field with only a g-string, No joke and nothing
        said at all. What gives?
        • Re: When puritanical mixes with litigious...

          Sat, February 7, 2004 - 5:21 PM
          Janet Jackson is a celebrity and young gals look to her as a role model. The Superbowl is supposed to be a family entertainment-not a breast-bearing competition.

          I'm way on the other side of the coin as far as you folks-hope you don't mind my input. :) I'm one of the people who doesn't watch much tv because I feel it is getting too risque'. Children are watching, and I find it offensive to my sexuallity which I believe is holy. I don't like that stuff being flaunted in my face. But, that's my opinion of the matter-take or leave.
          • Unsu...
             

            Re: When puritanical mixes with litigious...

            Wed, February 11, 2004 - 5:26 AM
            Shame on you, Janet Jackson!
            • Re: When puritanical mixes with litigious...

              Wed, February 11, 2004 - 8:51 AM
              :-) I think it's hilarious.. janet and justin get in trouble for exposing one of her breasts.
              • Unsu...
                 

                Re: When puritanical mixes with litigious...

                Wed, February 11, 2004 - 9:07 AM
                But what about the children?
                • Re: When puritanical mixes with litigious...

                  Wed, February 11, 2004 - 9:26 AM
                  AM, I believe children should not be exposed to violence or sex/nudity on TV or movies.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    Unsu...
                     

                    Re: When puritanical mixes with litigious...

                    Wed, February 11, 2004 - 9:37 AM
                    But you said it was funny, Zman!
                    • Re: When puritanical mixes with litigious...

                      Wed, February 11, 2004 - 9:44 AM
                      I know, but It was wrong of Miss Jackson and Mr. Timberlake to do that when kids where present. It was wrong to do that on a program that you know that elderly people, children and families are watching. if it where really late at night on HBO, then that would be ok, becuase HBO has alot of adult content.
                      • Re: When puritanical mixes with litigious...

                        Wed, February 11, 2004 - 9:46 AM
                        part of me thinks it funny, but part me also is serious about this issue. I have mixed feelings.
                        • Unsu...
                           

                          Re: When puritanical mixes with litigious...

                          Wed, February 11, 2004 - 10:01 AM
                          I am soooo with you. I love making love (only done it twice) but I have a hard time making sure I keep my core values.
                          • Re: When puritanical mixes with litigious...

                            Wed, February 11, 2004 - 8:19 PM
                            I love making love (only done it twice) but I have a hard time making sure I keep my core values. <--what does this have to do with janet purposley exposing her breast on the Super Bowl halftime show. Stick to the topic.



                            I should even be allowing this conservation, becuase it is mature content or could be considered mature content.
                            • Re: When puritanical mixes with litigious...

                              Fri, February 13, 2004 - 3:08 PM
                              i think it's ok to have a mature content conversation if we all agree that it's ok. we need to talk about these things. if we don't have more problems than before. if janet jackson (i love her) had talked about this breast showing before going on stage, we could have told her, maybe not this time. maybe another time when there are not kids watching. maybe she didn't know or realize that there was going to be so so many people upset with her for this. i don't think she was trying to upset parents.

                              we should talk about mature content more, not less.

                              sorry zack, i think we disagree. don't be mad at me ;)
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: When puritanical mixes with litigious...

                    Fri, February 13, 2004 - 12:14 AM
                    I agree with you there. I believe half of the people who were making a big huge deal about this were either around during the
                    Guns N Roses, Lita Ford, Ozzy, Arrowsmith, and all the other rock bands. What were the slogans does anyone remember?

                    Ummm Sex Drugs and Rock and roll.. Wonder how many were protesting then?lol. Ironic isn't it lol.
            • Re: When puritanical mixes with litigious...

              Fri, February 13, 2004 - 12:07 AM
              I am sorry but you say shame on Janet? Umm I don't mean to be
              a jerk or anything but aren't you naked in this picture? And
              if its right for you to do on the internet where there are children lerking about, elderly and so on, Ummm How can you shame Janet? Hers was a breast umm your whole body is exposed.
              And how come none of the other posters thought anything about this? How can it be right for some and not for others?
              Once again 2 years ago Lucy Lawless exposed her breast in the middle of the national anthem, nothing said no court nothing.
              I am wondering if janets public outrage has more to to with who she is related to instead of the issue on hand.

Recent topics in "People Unite!"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Paris Hilton Zack 5 April 14, 2005
Academic dishonesty, how serious a penalty? Joe 1 February 10, 2005
I would like to welcome our new members Unsubscribed 16 February 1, 2005
photograph Unsubscribed 2 January 30, 2005